#ClimateJustice politics is, I quote, "in opposition to a failing capitalist system [do you mean an allocation system?/ whatareyougoingtodoinstead?], recognising that such a system is racist, patriarchal, exploitative [yes, but who please is trying to do what? (and who is faking?), mmm, i wonder. And so, please, what is it like in your country / home?] and driven by a logic of imperial ecocide [is it that, in small measure surely, but in extremely large portion it is driven by "it will feed my .." (see below)?]. Through this recognition, climate justice asserts that the victims of capitalism’s oppressions are not going to pay the cost for more of the same."
[This is, in fact AFAICT, a libellous #BlameSomebodyElse / #BlameTheOTHER incitement. As you are (deceived, i imagine) into a #StartAWar strategy. Of someone else, who? While blaming someone else is great to rally the #troops, I suggest it does nothing that will help or address the v v real #problems.]
Development, and Resource Exploitation, Selling or/and Making things, arises from?
- - it will feed my family?
- - it will pay my pension?
- - it will make me rich?
Hence:
- - 380 million tonnes of humans,
- - 470 million tonnes of cattle/like,
- - 140 million tonnes of pigs,
- - 110 million tonnes of sheep/horse/etc,
- - 50 million tonnes of wild mammals,
Source: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/suppl/2018/07/13/1711842115.DC1/1711842115.sapp.pdf
"Climate Justice Politics will be": [it is hoped?]
- #democratic
- #indigenous
- #spiritual
- #africanist
- #popular
- #consciousness to "new" reality
- #solidarity struggles
Which will give the "programmatic mandate", "role", and "orientation", "from the masses" ~ [but whatifwedon'tknow?, or maybe .. ifwedontlike?], being the "social forces" leading to -> "programmatic + mass-based transformation". Which is the "alternative to techno-fixes (nuclear/market)".
"Climate Justice Politics is against":
- NOT !Monopoly [why?: this sounds like you feel "markets" (competing sellers) are sometimes helpful? otherwise this is internally incoherent]
- NOT !ecocidal [yes: we are all wilfully blind, in the extreme, to anything other than own interests, as in ".. it will pay my / etc .."]
- NOT !transnational [bethlehem/bao/peabody?; & demand = i will pay a lot for ../ + #insist and go into #incandescent rage if i don't get it (mmm.. unhh-ohhh!?)]
Some people, I quote, "occlude systemic understandings" [yes indeed: abuse..hurt..deaththreats..murderedfriendsrelatives..+..not-reply/dont-answer] ..who? ..why?
"a Radical Transformation is required in": [yes, absolutely]
- - energy
- - production
- - consumption
- - everyday life
That is "-> #systemic-reforms, in just #deeptransformation"
"Using, through":
- #commons
- #zerowaste [humans, how much waste is intentional, by either consumers or manufacturers? vs incentivised by profit (pay-the-bills/imperative?)]
- #nationalized-utils [= monopolies (in a way!); what will they try to do?]
- #democratic-planning [nimby; status-quo-bias; myopia; distractions; appealing-fantasy's (like this); liars/defectors/cheats (incentives/rewards?)]
- #participatory-budget [experience/tests: bello horizon? above? / .. i'm not sure]
"Not the following, which are failed strategies":
- #greenparty
- #state
- #party
"Based on":
- - democracy
- - values
- - coops
- - education / openscience
- ..
- - food sovereign
- - public ownership/coops [what are they trying to do?]
- - UBI [everybody? .. mmm?]
[it has to be ... ?]
No comments:
Post a Comment